Still, it seemed like yesterday the key word web search feature was “intermittent”. does that mean clicking on a library and then “pasting” a DOI there? I actually don’t know what DOI is, as I mainly am using Pubmed and their pmid numbers to connect to the reference. I couldn’t figure out what “pasting the DOI on the main table” means. so that part is maybe on the “good foot”. I did get a New entry entered in the library using the pmid number as I have done with BE in the past 14 years or so. so I got the difference between key word and pmid searches. I’ll be back in that laptop in awhile, so I’ll test out your method in a bit, not sure if that makes an extra step or if it’s “‘6’ to one, ‘half dozen’ to another,” etc? because, old habits, and because using the “Search” box at the bottom did seem to work in stable Jabref 5.2 before that we went to the newest devel edition to get the import the “endnote xml” files function working. I didn’t try the Library >New entry method. and it worked to find and enter the reference into the library, so it was working in Jabref, but now, possibly not? and I did it in the Jabref 5.2 edition that the Pop!_OS store provided for my first installation of Jabref. I historically used this method in BE to retrieve references that I pre-read via the digest emails. Then a search dialog window opens and it says in the middle of the window “processing 29016274”. In Australia, the new parameterization amplifies the magnitude and timescale of dust variability and better simulates the El Niño-Southern Oscillation-dust relationship by more than doubling its strength.I didn’t try it that way, I was using the “search” >Pubmed down at the bottom left, where Pubmed is in a list of drop down items to select from. In an additional novel step, we couple this new dust parameterization to the dynamic vegetation model LM3.
![jabref adsabs web search jabref adsabs web search](http://www.scielo.edu.uy/img/revistas/cleiej/v14n1/1a04f2.jpg)
Here we introduce a new dust parameterization into the NOAA/Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory climate model CM3 that represents land surface processes controlling dust sources including soil water and ice, snow cover, vegetation characteristics, and land type. General circulation models, however, typically fail to simulate this variability. 11 article DOI URL Abstract: Observations show that Australian dust activity varies by a factor of 4 on decadal timescales. Climate-vegetation interaction and amplification of Australian dust variability As PDS is a good predictor of emissions and incorporates surface dynamics it could improve models of future dust emissions. The exception is for areas of low magnitude but persistent emissions such as alluvial surfaces where PDS overpredicts dustiness. For this region, the predicted variability and magnitude of dust emissions from most surface types present coincides with the observed characteristics demonstrating the significance of geomorphological controls on emission. The predicted ranked importance of each geomorphic type for dust emissions is compared with the actual ranked importance as determined from the satellite-derived dust loading. We examine the PDS qualitative conceptual model of surface emissivity alongside a quantitative measurement of dust loading from Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) Deep Blue Collection 6 for the Chihuahuan Desert. 2606-2613 article DOI URL Abstract: The preferential dust source (PDS) scheme enables large-scale mapping of geomorphology in terms of importance for dust emissions but has not been independently tested other than at local scales.
![jabref adsabs web search jabref adsabs web search](https://static.vecteezy.com/system/resources/previews/000/421/645/original/vector-web-search-icon.jpg)
Do MODIS-defined dust sources have a geomorphological signature? ignore accents Author Title Year Journal Reftype DOI/URL Baddock, M.C., Ginoux, P., Bullard, J.E.